Category Archives: Expatriate Taxation

Postings and discussions about expatriate tax topics

International HR Forum Year in Review 2009 – Best of Expatriates and International Assignments

This is the second of our three-part “Best of …” series, where we will feature links to our best posts on selected topics. This part is focused on Expatriates and International Assignments.  We will publish one more “Best of …” posting, featuring content about Leadership Development and Cross-Cultural topics, before the new year.  If you missed the first post about Compensation and Benefits, you can take a look at it here.

The posts below are some of the most popular ones featured on the International HR Forum.

We hope you find these summary posts to be a helpful way to explore some of the best content on our blog.

Best of Expatriates and International Assignments from the 2009 Archives of the International HR Forum:

Ten Tax Tips for Twelve-Thirtyone: Year-End HR and Payroll Actions for Global Mobility

Author:
Claudia Howe – Global Mobility Tax, LLP

Wow!  Where did the year go?  Now that it’s almost over, HR and payroll professionals are working hard to finish out the year.  In the world of expatriate compensation and taxation, here is a reminder list of 10 things to do before December 31 (for our international readers, I realize this will be a bit US-centric, but hopefully useful nevertheless):

Tip #1: Pay all taxes due for jurisdictions that do not have a 12/31 year-end
Some countries have different year-ends, for example:  Australia = June 30,  Hong Kong = March 31,  New Zealand = March 31,  UK = April 5,  South Africa = February 28.

If taxes are not paid throughout the year or by 12/31 (especially in the first year of assignment), the employee or the company (for tax equalized assignees) may lose out on claiming important foreign tax credits on the US tax return and could have a nasty surprise at April 15.  This is due to the fact that the US only allows tax credits on the US return against taxes paid or accrued during the tax year.

For example:  Suppose you have an expat from the US in the UK since June 2009 and have not quite been able to get regular monthly UK tax payments set up.  If  UK taxes have not been remitted to Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (aka UK tax authorities) before 12/31, they cannot be claimed as a credit on the US return, causing temporary (and potentially permanent) double taxation!

Tip #2:  Pay all US taxes due through payroll
Perhaps you are aware of a very large January bonus that was not withheld at the top marginal rate and on which a US tax payment  should be made to avoid the underpayment penalty.   What are the options to make the payment?

  • Option 1:  send a check in the mail to the IRS with an estimated tax payment voucher (1040-ES – Q4, due January 15).
  • Option 2:  make the payment through payroll before 12/31.

Best choice?  Option 2.  When making payment through withholding, the IRS will treat it as evenly paid throughout the year and this will minimize/eliminate estimated tax penalties that could otherwise apply.

Tip #3: Update your tax accruals
Year-end budgeting is in progress.  If there are liabilities out there – be it US or foreign tax liabilities that will come due, it is important to accrue for them so that the financials are correct and also to avoid surprises later on.

Tip #4: Review relocation Gross-ups
For folks that were relocated during the tax year but are not tax equalized, a relocation gross-up should be processed if the company promised to pick up the taxes on the taxable items such as temporary lodging, temporary transportation, etc.  Many major relocation companies will do this for you, or will at least give you the amounts to be grossed-up.  Tax professionals can also be useful here especially if you are relocating an executive with the expectation of no tax detriment:  your 25% supplemental rate would likely not cover that tax bill and you could end up with a disgruntled exec at tax time in April.

If you process gross-ups at year-end, don’t forget to send a courtesy email to the employee informing him/her why the last paystub or the W-2 looks so much higher all of the sudden.  And be sure to process the payments of withholding through payroll (see Tip #2, Option 2 above!).

Tip #5: Review expatriate compensation details for W-2 inclusion
The tricky part of expatriate compensation is that it is usually not delivered all from one location;  many items such as housing, children’s education, local tax payments, etc.  are paid from the host location and are not channeled back to US payroll for inclusion in the W-2 (which, of course is required by law:  all compensation no matter where or how paid must be reported to the IRS on the W-2).

It is especially at year-end that I am reminded that our colleagues in payroll are indeed the unsung heroes of corporate America:  they are expected to deliver correct payroll on-time with 100% accuracy all the time – talk about stress! And no-one stops by to say:  “Thanks, Andrea, for getting my W-2 right – I know it must have been a challenge”!

Tip #6: Review withholding on US bonus, commission and equity compensation payouts
For US expatriates on assignment in a foreign location, remaining on US payroll, usually federal (and sometimes state) withholding will be turned off.  In lieu of the actual withholding, a hypothetical tax withholding for tax equalized folks is implemented or a fixed withholding amount for the foreign jurisdiction is taken out of the pay.  Since oftentimes these are fixed dollar amounts per paycheck, the withholding on bonuses or commissions are easily overlooked. Better late than never – now is a good time to review and ascertain that the correct amount of withholding has been taken out of these type of payments to ensure that the employee does not owe the company or the governments any underwitheld amounts.

If actual federal/state taxes are withheld from executive or high-income taxpayer’s bonus and commission payments, and if the person is tax equalized, you will want to ensure that taxes were withheld at the highest marginal rates, not the 25% supplemental rate.

Tip #7: Finalize your Authorization List
Make sure to finalize the list of employees that are eligible for tax services and let your tax service provider know before 12/31.  Delays beyond that date could delay the kick-off for the tax season.  Then your employees could be left wondering if their taxes will be taken care of – or not?

Tip #8: Sign your Engagement Letters

Your tax firm may not be able to provide services until they get that signed engagement letter back from the company.  So better check with the person who signs the letter to make sure it get out and not hung up in legal or procurement.  Again, delays could cause problems for your employees.

Tip #9: Solicit the completed 2009 travel calendars from all assignees
This can be coordinated with the tax firm you are using; the travel calendar is one of the most important items in the tax preparation process.  Most will supply you with an automated calendar at the beginning of the year to make this process easy, but of course, your assignees have to use the tool!  Tax firms spend almost half of the tax preparation time on reporting compensation in the correct format and sourced to the correct jurisdiction.  The travel calendar is a key item needed for this exercise as well as to determine tax residency status, qualification for tax exclucsions, etc.  The earlier the tax professionals can get their hands on it, the better!

Tip #10: Don’t forget to enjoy the holidays!
We all tend to get very stressed at year-end – it is a hectic time, after all!  But sometimes we do have to remind ourselves that we need to take a deep breath, sit back, and relax…and enjoy the Season!

Happy Holidays!

More about Claudia:

Avoiding Burnout in Global Field Service Travel

IMG_1602cropAuthor:
Alan Freeman – LOF International HR Solutions

The following question, recently posted to an online discussion group, caught my eye:

“Our international technical services business is booming.  Our Field Service Techs are getting burnt out spending 2-3 months away from home. How can I incentivize them to keep traveling? They already receive an attractive daily bonus for each day in travel.  Also, some of the new clients are in areas that are not very desirable.”

My dear old grandpa used to tell me, “Son, if you run your horses too hard and too long, especially over rocky ground, they’re going to fall in exhaustion or go lame.  No amount of extra oats will make any difference.”

So what’s the problem?

 

Notable drop-offs in productivity, poor morale, health problems and, ultimately, resignations (at least in normal economic times) go hand-in-glove with heavy travel-related burnout – especially international travel to “not very desirable areas”.  If high crime rates, existence of serious infectious diseases, lack of sanitation, political unrest or even outright violence are characteristic of those destinations, then the prospect of employees being harmed, kidnapped or killed becomes a significant concern as well.

An indirect, negative impact on morale and productivity also can stem from marital or family problems attributable to employees’ extended absence from their spouses, partners and families.  Heavy travel on the part of one parent puts additional stress on the stay-at-home partner to look after the children, elderly parents, pets, household maintenance, financial management, etc.  In our experience, Field Service employees often maintained their homes and vehicles themselves so the spouse had to hire outside providers to look after these issues while the employee was traveling.

Throwing money at employees won’t make them or their families less susceptible to burnout, but it could contribute to a company reputation for “slave driving” and failing to understand the human side of the travel sacrifice. This is not a desirable outcome for the company or the employee.

What might be useful?

 

A firm could consider providing extended paid leave, “R&R”, between trips. Take a lesson from oil & gas, engineering & construction and defense contracting firms and utilize the “rotational assignment” approach.  Simply put, for every x weeks or months the employee works on travel, he/she is eligible for y weeks or months off on paid leave at home or in a “nice” location at company expense.  For example, one of our clients provides services at a mining site in a developing country.  Their employees work 7 days a week for 3 months at a camp site and then are sent home for a month off with full pay.

I once worked on a project where, after the employee worked 1 month (single status) at a remote Middle Eastern camp site, the company would pay for the employee and family to rendezvous in a Western European city, all expenses paid up to a set maximum, for a week.  Expensive? Yes, certainly.  Did it “refresh the horses”, improve morale and productivity and build positive morale and attitude toward the company?  Absolutely!

Sometimes, depending upon the facts and circumstances, it’s possible to provide some form of relaxation in-country (health club memberships, a bit of time off to sight-see, company-paid recreation, etc.) during travel.  This is another way to give them a needed rest.

Another possibility would be to hire additional Field Service staff so more employees share the travel burden and thereby make it possible for each to spend a bit less time in the field.  Yes, in today’s economic environment of extreme cost control, adding to labor cost is not a popular idea in the CFO’s office.  But then, what about the cost of assignment refusal, turnover, reduced productivity, lost opportunity while employees miss work due to illness or injury, and inability to recruit high caliber talent, etc.?

We also must ask how challenging, especially dangerous, are the “not very desirable” areas?  Iraq? Afghanistan? Somalia?  A jungle infested with disease-bearing mosquitoes?  Make sure you provide appropriate pre-travel medical exams and immunizations, and adopt some of the safety and security practices companies used for longer-term international assignees in hardship and danger locations.  This includes local safety and security plans, well thought out and established emergency evacuation plans and ensuring that death and disability insurance benefits are not voided by “war risk waiver” clauses in the insurance contracts.  This latter issue can easily be addressed through contact riders but, if not addressed proactively, can lead to extensive financial pain for the employer, especially given laws pertaining to the “duty of reasonable care”.  Woe unto those companies that have not established the mechanisms to track their employees’ whereabouts and deal effectively and quickly with emergencies.  Check out Mariana’s posting for some tips on extreme hardship assignments.

Our friends at International SOS Assistance are about to publish a research paper on employers’ legal “duty of care” that our readers should find of interest.

Something the person who raised the question didn’t mention – but we will – are global requirements for work permits, visas and tax compliance.  Often, even those on relatively brief field support trips to other countries are deemed by local governments to be performing “productive work” in those countries.  This can, and often does, require a work permit.  A company is well advised to consult with appropriate immigration counsel to ensure that its employees have the proper clearance to carry out their duties in each country.  This is not about the amount of time the employee might spend working in country; it is all about what he/she will be doing while in country.

As to taxes, members of management have often heard about the so-called “183 day rule” and simplistically believe that so long as the employee works in a given country for less than 183 days, he/she will not be liable for local income or social insurance taxes in the assignment country.  This is not necessarily the case and depends upon a number of key factors.  We recommend reading our contributing editor Claudia Howe’s excellent commentary on this issue.

So, at the end of the day, how do we respond to the question of “How do we incentivize our staff to keep traveling”?  We’d say, give your horses rest, treat them with dignity, recognize that their families bear a burden too, and provide them with fresh oats.

Otherwise, my dear old grandfather just might come back to haunt you!

About Alan

Website

Alan on LinkedIn

Should Global Mobility Services Be Centralized?

Author:
Warren Heaps – Birches Group LLC

As organizations continue to look for the best way to manage their globally mobile employees (expats), one of the most common issues to address is the best organizational structure to provide the necessary services and support to this group.   What is the optimal structure – centralized or decentralized – and how does an organization decide which approach is best for them?

Back to Basics
Expat management is a cross-functional discipline made up of several different areas of expertise, each highly technical in their own right, including relocation, compensation, tax, payroll and immigration.   To be effective, one must become familiar with all of these areas, and master at least a few of them.

In addition, customer service and vendor management are critical, especially given the preponderance of outsourcing to third-party providers.   Finally, all Global Mobility departments need a link back to the global talent management strategy in their company.

In my opinion, few companies, and few individuals in those companies, are really truly experts in all the aspects of Global Mobility.  Therefore, it makes a lot of sense to centralize mobility services, and invest in and develop the few staff that do have the capacity and experience to become experts.   Depending on the size of your assignee population, this could be at the corporate or HQ level, or in organizations with larger assignee groups, at the regional level.

The Regional Model
One of the most common structures used by many organizations today is the regional one, typically Americas, Europe-Middle East-Africa (EMEA), and Asia-Pacific.   Under this approach, a designated regional center coordinates all of the assignment management for the region.   The reality is that all organizations are at least partially outsourced, so much of the work is handled by third-party providers, and the role of the internal staff also includes the management of these outsourced processes.

A regional structure helps to ensure consistency across a broad range of countries, and develops deep knowledge of local practices, to provide the highest possible level of support to assignees.  In many cases, regional suppliers are engaged, based on their local market knowledge and performance in the region.

The Global Model
Some organizations choose to centralize services at headquarters.  This model ensures the highest level of consistency, since one group is responsible for all service delivery.   With smaller programs, this approach can work; as programs get larger, however, the regional model quickly emerges as a more practical solution.

Under a global model, there are often opportunities to ensure high levels of tax compliance and identify tax planning opportunities effectively.   These decisions require input from corporate tax and finance as well as human resources, and are best managed jointly at the headquarters level of the organization.

Another added advantage of the global model is the selection of outside providers, which would tend to be more global as well.   Realize, however, that few service providers can really provide services everywhere – they all rely on partner organizations to supplement their own resources.

The Decentralized Approach
There are some companies which continue to manage their mobile employees through a network of local offices, without any centralized support at the regional or global level.   This is a challenging way to operate for all but the very smallest programs, and may give rise to missed opportunities in areas such as vendor consolidation, tax planning and the general efficiency of the program.   Even under a decentralized approach, however, a standard international assignment policy should be developed and distributed, ensuring a minimum level of consistency.

Tools to Help Manage Your Program
Another factor to consider is the level of automation available to your organization.  Without a technology tool for assignment management that is accessible globally, decentralization is not realistic.  These days, there are hosted (SaaS) solutions which are affordable and very powerful, and integrate easily with your global ERP solution.   Whether you work with a specialized vendor, such as Atlas or MoveOne, or rely on your accounting or relocation firm, deploying a robust assignment management software solution goes a long way to simplifying your expat administration and helps eliminate redundant and inefficient processes.

Ask yourself a simple question – how many expats do you have in your company today?   If you cannot answer this question with confidence, you need a better tool to manage your program.

Don’t overlook short-term assignees, commuter assignments and short-term business travelers.   Each of these assignees require tax, relocation and immigration services, and if poorly managed, can result in unexpected costs. You should be able to capture all types of assignees in your assignment management system.

Moving Your Program Forward
Now that I’ve got you thinking about how your expat administration is being managed, take a careful look at your organization structure.  What kinds of changes might be beneficial?  Where are you biggest “sore spots”?

Post some comments about your specific challenges, and we can try to address them.

More About Warren

Warren Heaps

Warren on LinkedIn

Developing Markets Compensation and Benefits Group in LinkedIn

Email Warren

Birches Group

Avoiding Tax Traps with Short-Term Assignments

Claudia HoweAuthor:
Claudia Howe – Global Mobility Tax, LLP

Has anybody heard about the magic 183 days?  So, if you stay in the host country for less than 183 days, you don’t have to pay tax in that country, right?  … right?  Well, actually the answer is:  sometimes.

Many folks will remember the 183-day rule, but often they do not quite know why or how.  But it sure lulls many international short-term business assignees (and their managers) into a false sense of security that as long as they are in the other country for less than that magic number of days, thinking they will be exempt from that country’s tax.  Let’s step back.

Tax Treaties Help Prevent Double Taxation

Tax treaties come into play when two countries want to tax the same income leading to the dreaded “double taxation.”  As the world has become smaller and more and more people are conducting business in countries other than their home, these folks find themselves in a position where they may be required to pay tax in both countries under the domestic law of each country.  For example, a UK employee goes to the US for a four-month project.  The UK will tax her on her world-wide income by virtue of being a tax resident in the UK.  The US federal government will want to tax her US source income because she has “effectively connected income.”

How Tax Treaties Work

Tax treaties provide that if certain conditions exist, the person is not taxable in the foreign jurisdiction, in this case the US.  Beware, each treaty is worded differently, but in general, the three main treaty conditions for an individual employed in the home country, and claiming exemption from tax in the host country under Article 15, the Dependent Services article, are:

  1. The employee does not exceed 183 days in the host country.
  2. The remuneration is paid by the home country entity (home payroll).
  3. The remuneration is not charged back to an entity in the host country.

As mentioned above, be careful to read the exact wording in each treaty to evaluate exactly what it says – there are variations on the theme.  For example, the 183 days could be in a calendar year, fiscal year, or in a rolling 12 months. The US has concluded numerous treaties and neatly lists them on the IRS website.   The UK also has a list.

The Fourth Requirement (in some countries)

Over the past few years, another hurdle to using the treaty has crystalized itself, also know as the “economic employer” approach.   The term “employed” or “employment” as stated in Article 15 had not previously been defined, until the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) stated that substance trumped form.  This means that even if the person is legally employed by the home country, the entity that is receiving the benefit of the services, namely the host country entity, could be construed to be the real employer and therefore the Article would not be useable to exempt the income from tax in the host country.  The US has not adopted this approach as of yet, but many of the European countries that follow the OECD model treaty have.

Our friend from the UK on the 4 month assignment remains on UK payroll, spends less than 183 days in the US during any 12 month period (even vacation days not related to the assignment count), and her company does not cross-charge her compensation cost to any US entity.  So, is she off the hook?

State Tax Implications

Not completely.  The treaty in this case will enable our UK friend to be exempt from US federal taxes, but since she is working in the beautiful (and broke) state of California, which does not accept any treaties concluded by the US federal government, she will still be subject to California tax, regardless.

Social Tax Implications

Our friend also has to make sure that her employer has applied for a certificate of coverage under the US/UK totalization agreement to exempt her from US social taxes (more on that another time).

Foreign Tax Credits

Even if the conditions for an exemption from the host country tax are not met, the treaty can still be helpful in avoiding double taxation:  the income may now be taxable in the host country, but under the Relief of Double Taxation article (contained in most treaties), the home country must grant a credit for taxes paid in the host country, up to the amount of tax that would have been paid in the home country on that same income.   This might also apply in cases where no treaties exist.  Keep in mind, though, that in some countries, the practical requirements for claim a foreign tax credit are so complex that for small amounts, it may not even be worth the bother.

Summary

So, what should you, an HR professional, faced with the news of a short-term assignment and, the manager’s famous last words are: “we will make sure it’s less than 183 days,” do?

  1. Check the host country’s domestic law for when a person will become taxable.
  2. If taxable, check if the home and host country have a treaty and then find the latest version of the treaty (not the one you printed 5 years ago and … “it’s gotta be somewhere in this drawer”).
  3. Request a detailed travel schedule for 12 months prior to the assignment from the employee to understand how much time he or she has already spend in the host country for any reason (vacation, holiday, trade shows, business trips, etc.).
  4. Read all the provisions of the treaty carefully.
  5. Find out from the manager and your finance team if the compensation will indeed remain in the home country and will not be charged to the host entity or a client in the host country.
  6. Find out if the host country has adopted the “economic employer” approach.
  7. Are there any other taxing jurisdictions that you need to consider (state/province/social tax, etc.)?
  8. Whew – I am getting tired just writing all these things. . . . .

Unless you have checked all this out, you cannot rely on the famous 183 days.  And don’t forget the reporting and filing requirements for each jurisdiction!  You may want to call your favorite global mobility tax professional to assist with all of the above and to co-develop the options for the assignment step by step so you can articulate the risks and options to that manager and to your management.

More information on Claudia:

Expats…What tax?

Claudia HoweAuthor:
Claudia Howe – Global Mobility Tax, LLP

You are an HR professional (or a VP of Tax or a CFO) and you have just been told that your company wants to send an expat (oh horror!) to the UK.  “Expat,” you think to yourself – “what now?  How can we understand the costs, and what about taxes – isn’t that a really expensive and complicated area?”

Understanding the Basics

Understanding the basics of an expat assignment is critical, especially the tax costs.  As many already know, the tax costs can be the most significant line item on the cost projection worksheet.  But don’t worry; there are ways to manage it!

If your company does not have an international assignment policy in place, you will have to determine the whole package including housing, COLA, education cost for the kids, and what tax reimbursement philosophy is to be employed.  Without a policy, many of these items will be subject to individual negotiations.  This can work for a few assignees, but once you expand your program beyond one or two, it’s a good idea to establish a formal policy to help manage costs and reign in the negotiations.  While all of the aspects of an expat policy are interesting, my expertise is in the global tax arena, so this posting will concentrate on how to decide the best approach to managing taxes for your expats.

Tax Reimbursement Methods

When an employee goes overseas, there is always an impact on the employee’s taxes – income taxes and social taxes.  If left unmanaged, there could be unforeseen consequences, either positive or negative, from the employee’s perspective as well as from the employer’s viewpoint.  Expat tax policies address these issues with tax reimbursement methods including tax protection, tax equalization, or the “simplest” of all:  laissez-faire (aka “do nothing”).

While laissez-faire keeps the company’s costs down, it usually gets the expat worried about the tax implications of the assignment as any incremental costs will directly hit the assignee’s bottom line.

Tax equalization and tax protection are alternatives which help both employees and employers manage the costs of assignments.  If you are not familiar with tax equalization or tax protection, it is easy to get them confused.  Here are the basic definitions:

  • Tax Protection – Employees are “protected” from any additional taxes that may result from the international assignment but can benefit from any decrease in taxes which may occur when, for example, moving from a high-tax country to a low-tax country or no-tax country.  So, the employee may pay less tax, but will never pay more than if at home.
  • Tax Equalization – Employees are “equalized” so they pay the same amount of tax – no more, no less – as if they were at home.  The company pays any difference and also benefits from any tax reductions.  This method is the most equitable for a workforce and the employees can easily understand the tax impact on them:  none – the employees pay the same tax as if at home.

Both methods are designed to help the employee, and if the host country tax rates are higher than the home country tax rates, then they technically will result in the same bottom line to the employee and the same cost to the company in the long run.  The fine distinction between the two is that with tax protection the company promises the expat that he will be reimbursed for any excess tax costs over his “stay-at-home tax,” i.e. he will pay no more than had he stayed home.  Tax equalization says that the employee will pay “neither more nor less” than had he remained in the home location.  And, unless they are going to Dubai, the host country will have the right of taxation and will tax the income (yes, even if paid from the home country and even if the work performed is for the benefit of some other location).  Because the host country tax system is unfamiliar, it is not always easy to know how much tax will be due in that country.

Tax Equalization vs. Tax Protection

Here you are, with your first expat, and you now wonder:  “hmm – tax protect or tax equalize” – how should we decide this?

The answer is usually more complex than meets the eye.  When you are in the infancy stage of your expatriate program you usually can afford customization to each expat’s situation.   We often see in practice that the first few assignments in an organization are custom built.  Tax reimbursement policies are often written once the first few assignments are already underway.

Here are some examples to help illustrate the two approaches.

Tax Protection Example

Let me give you an example where I would clearly recommend tax protection:  you are moving a young single line manager from the UK to Spain for 2  years; she will not receive any allowances, only relocation benefits.  The tax protection gives her the additional assurance that she is not going to pay more tax than had she remained home, but if she pays less in Spain than what she would have paid in the UK on the same income, then she gets to enjoy the windfall (and spend the extra money on something nice).

Tax Equalization Example

However, on the other end of the extremes, for example, when you are moving a US executive with wife and school age children from the US to Singapore, I would highly recommend tax equalization.  You ask:  why?  Well, it usually will take a bit more financial incentive to get the executive to accept the “risk” (financial and otherwise) of taking such an assignment (so he is doing the company a favor).  The assignment costs will increase due to the family’s need for financial assurance, there is a cost of living differential, and housing is a lot more expensive.  So, the cost projection worksheet is filling up quickly and the total compensation reportable in both countries becomes staggering.  All the numbers will make everyone’s heads spin, but the company really needs this executive to focus on the task at hand.  The easiest way calm this person’s financial anxiety is to tax equalize; promise him that he will pay the same amount of tax as if he had stayed home.  This will tie his personal bottom line to a tax system he is familiar with and leaves the tax planning and tax risks in the hands of the company (and their trusty tax advisors).  This approach also allows the company to pursue expatriate tax planning strategies to help manage the tax costs, therefore reducing the overall cost of the assignment.  Such strategies are available in many countries but require expert assistance and a full examination of income, social and corporate tax impacts.

How To Get Started

So, what about this first expat you are told is going to the UK next week (or wait, did they say he had moved already?  Or was that just a business trip?)?  It is best to break it down into the big components first:  immigration, payroll, taxation, relocation etc.

Then consider the needs of the company and the needs of the employee and find out the costs to each party under a couple of scenarios.  Once the costs have been established (and you may need assistance with some of the items) then it is time to go back to management to get the costs approved.  And don’t forget the tax costs!

Yes, managing expats is a complex and daunting task at first.  But if you prepare yourself with good information, helpful advisors, and most importantly gain strong support from your line managers, your company can reap the benefits of international assignees and, at the same time, manage the costs effectively.

More about Claudia

Payroll for Expatriates – How Hard Can This Be?

Author:
Dave Leboff – Expaticore Services LLC

Why does it seem that expat payroll administration is so hard to get right? Why is it so hard to deliver pay correctly and timely to this class of 50 or 150 important employees when it seems so smooth for the other 10,000 or 100,000? The answer lies in the reality that payroll for expatriates often seems to be the second job of those involved.

Expat policies are developed with care and designed to compensate the employee fairly, facilitate mobility, be competitive with peer companies and are sensible economically. Policy development usually sits within the HR function. Executing that policy always requires the involvement of your payroll function which has to deliver and record expat compensation and benefits correctly and compliantly, in one or two countries concurrently – and often multiple two-country permutations.

Payroll professionals are talented, hardworking experts who handle thousands upon thousands of domestic pay transactions with 99+% accuracy. But their success is dependent upon the efficient application of rules to situations – many of them coded in the software they use. For example, limits for FICA or 401(k) contributions in the US require no effort by the payroll professional. They correct limits and computations are part of the tools they rely on.

With expatriates, the rules are not built in. For example, a US employee working on assignment in Mexico may have US payroll running every two weeks. In Mexico it may run every month. In Mexico there may be requirements to deliver 13th month and vacation pay as well as other legislated perquisites. How should this be reflected on the US payroll? Should the expat receive the extra Mexican benefits or should the payroll delivery be manipulated to eliminate them from the gross deliverable? There are foreign exchange interplays. Splitting pay is often involved. Paycodes and general ledger coding relevant to expat benefits need to be organized so that the underlying accounting gets done correctly.

As you can see from this simple example, payroll professionals must not only clearly understand how the company wants to address compensation and benefits for expats, they need to drive many decisions relating to how the compensation and benefits are delivered, how they are accounted for, how changes will be authorized and instructions presented to them. They need to ensure that there are proper codes set up so that items that may be exempt from tax in another jurisdiction show up as taxable in theirs if appropriate. They must understand when and how to “gross up” for taxes, which is not a simple process in many cases and software managing payroll around the world does not often have grossup capability built in.

So the next time you ask “why can’t the payroll department get the expats right?” understand that they are handling expat concepts that are unusual and complex. There are ways to reduce the burden on payroll professionals who deal with expatriates. We will continue to address these issues over time within this International HR blog.

More About Dave:

Dave Leboff

Dave on LinkedIn

Email Dave

Expaticore